v0.39 · FOUNDING COACH CHALLENGE AGENT
14 scored coaching experiments. One evidence-based AI Coaching Passport.
Recommended pace: 14 days; completion window: 21 days. Every mission receives a 0–100 Coaching Value Score. Practical missions measure baseline → intervention → re-test → performance Δ, with evidence confidence, attribution confidence and AI augmentation uplift.
CANDIDATE ONBOARDING EXPERIENCE
Start My Founding Coach Challenge
Freely explore Day 1–14 missions in any order. Your Challenge Agent will guide one mission at a time. You keep the outputs: Passport evidence, AI-collaboration profile, training plan, native-language contribution, player-development case and 90-day Founding Coach proposal.
v0.39 · PERFORMANCE VALUE ENGINE
Measure coaching value, not task completion.
Each experiment uses Baseline → Diagnosis → AI Analysis → Human Judgment → Intervention → Re-test → Δ → Reflection. Scores remain contextual and evidence-weighted.
AI-AUGMENTED COACHING VALUE SCORE · ACVS
9-DIMENSION WEIGHTED INDEXEvaluates coaching interventions rigorously from diagnostic baseline to measured post-intervention performance improvement (Δ).
| Dimension | Weight | Measurement Focus |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Problem Diagnosis | 15% | Depth and accuracy of identifying player technical/tactical bottlenecks |
| 2. Evidence / Baseline Quality | 10% | Objective video timestamps, rep counts, success rates, and tracking data |
| 3. Intervention Design | 15% | Drill specificity, constraints, progression steps, and coaching cue alignment |
| 4. Human Judgment Over AI | 15% | Contextual ACCEPT / MODIFY / REJECT decision quality and rationale |
| 5. Execution / Coaching Quality | 10% | Delivery on the pitch, verbal cues, timing, and player correction cadence |
| 6. Measured Performance Improvement (Δ) | 20% | Re-test performance delta across validated technical benchmarks |
| 7. Attribution Confidence | 5% | Statistical confidence linking player delta to coach intervention |
| 8. Player Adaptation & Communication | 5% | Linguistic authenticity, player psychological safety, and cue retention |
| 9. Reflection & Next Iteration | 5% | Actionable post-session synthesis and updated Player Twin trajectory |
CONTEXT NORMALIZATION
CAPDI Framework
Context-Adjusted Player Development Impact separates raw numerical Δ from age category (U8 vs U17), starting skill baseline, task difficulty, intervention duration, evidence resolution, and attribution confidence.
14-DAY MEASUREMENT PROGRESSION PIPELINE
AI AUGMENTATION UPLIFT MATRIX
Independent diagnosis, cue selection, and session plan recorded prior to viewing AI telemetry.
AI quantitative critique revealed; coach exercises human authority (ACCEPT / MODIFY / REJECT) with documented rationale.
Post-intervention re-test compares player performance delta. AI uplift is measured by decision quality, not blind agreement.
LIVE EXPERIMENT Δ & UPLIFT CALCULATOR